Karafi

Third Issue It is the letter "Kaf." Indication It is known, understanding the nature of a thing is one matter; affirming its body is another matter. It is necessary to distinguish these two points. Because the actual body of many things is certain, but imagination, ruling over it, can reach the degree of denial, even from possibility. If you wish, ask the Seventh Premise; it will answer you with "No knowledge." Also, when the texts of many things are categorical, people have deviated in their interpretations. Perhaps, in the answer to the question "What is the intention?" they have become confused in understanding. If you wish, open the Eleventh Premise. You will find this essence. Notice Suppose this is the case. From the categorical texts referring to "Kaf," only 1 Q - "And the Noble Quran" is mentioned. However, it is permissible that it could be like "Sad" or others. It is not in the east of the world, perhaps in the west of the mouth. With this possibility, the evidence loses certainty. Also, one proof that there is no other categorical evidence for this is that Karafi, a prominent jurist of evil, said "It has no basis." However, the well-known attributed quality to Ibn Abbas, look at the Fourth Premise. The method of attribution will become clear to you. However, not every statement attributed to Ibn Abbas must necessarily be a hadith, nor must every narration attributed to him necessarily be accepted. Because in his youth, Ibn Abbas attributed some things to Israiliyat (Jewish traditions), as a means to reveal certain truths, through storytelling.

Muhakemat ·Birinci Makale Ucuncu Mesele ·machine translation (qwen3-32b-sre)

Third Issue It is the letter "Kaf." Indication It is known that understanding the nature of a thing is one matter; affirming its physical existence is another. It is necessary to distinguish these two points. For the actual existence of many things is certain, yet imagination, ruling over them, can elevate them from possibility to actuality. If you ask the Seventh Premise, it will answer you with "Neam." Moreover, even when the texts of many things are categorical, people have erred in their interpretations. Perhaps, in answering the question "What is Murad?" they have become confused in their understanding. If you open the Eleventh Premise, you will find this essence. Notice Suppose this is the case. From the categorical texts referring to "Kaf," only the verse 1 ق - وَالْقُرْآَنِ الْمَجِيدِ is mentioned. However, it is permissible that "Kaf" could be like "Sad," or something else. It may not be in the east of the world, but perhaps in the west of the mouth. With this possibility, the evidence loses its certainty. Moreover, one proof that the categorical interpretation is not the only one is that Karafi, a prominent jurist of the school of Islamic jurisprudence, said "It has no basis." However, the well-known attributed interpretation to Ibn Abbas, look at the Fourth Premise. The manner of attribution will become clear to you. However, not every statement attributed to Ibn Abbas must necessarily be a hadith, nor must every narration attributed to him necessarily be accepted. For in his youth, Ibn Abbas attributed some stories to the Israelites, as a means to reveal certain truths.

Muhakemat ·Muhakemat ·machine translation (qwen3-32b-sre)

Third Issue It is the letter "Kaf." Indication It is known that understanding the nature of a thing is one matter; affirming its physical existence is another. It is necessary to distinguish these two points. For the actual existence of many things is certain, yet imagination, ruling over them, can elevate them from possibility to actuality. If you ask the Seventh Premise, it will answer you with "Neam." Moreover, even when the texts of many things are categorical, people have deviated in their interpretations. Perhaps, in answering the question "What is Murad?" they have become confused in their understanding. If you open the Eleventh Premise, you will find this essence. Notice Suppose this is the case. From the categorical texts referring to "Kaf," only this is stated: 1 ق - وَالْقُرْآَنِ الْمَجِيدِ. However, it is permissible that it could be like "Sad" or similar. It may not be in the east of the world, but perhaps in the west of the mouth. With this possibility, the evidence loses its certainty. Moreover, one proof that there is no other categorical evidence for this is that Karafi, a prominent jurist of the school of Islamic jurisprudence, said 2 لاَ أَصْلَ لَهُ (there is no basis for it). However, the well-known attributed quality to Ibn Abbas, look at the Fourth Premise. The manner of attribution will become clear to you. However, not every statement attributed to Ibn Abbas necessarily constitutes a hadith, nor does every narration attributed to him necessarily be accepted. For in his youth, Ibn Abbas attributed some Israelite stories, not as belief, but as a narrative means to reveal certain truths.

Muhakemat ·Mektup 61 ·machine translation (qwen3-32b-sre)